| Autor: |
Muurling, Marijn, de Boer, Casper, Bügler, Maximilian, Harms, Robbert, Tarnanas, Ioannis, Kouzak, Rouba, Verheij, Herman, Nies, Vera J.M., Daskalova, Yoanna, Stolk, Pieter, Durudas, Andre, Curcic, Jelena, Hannesdottir, Kristin, Erdemli, Gul, Hinds, Chris, Wu, Yuhao, Lucivero, Federica, Stavropoulos, Thanos G., Owens, Andrew P., Narayan, Vaibhav A. |
| Zdroj: |
Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association; Dec2021 Supplement S5, Vol. 17, p1-3, 3p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: The 'Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse – Alzheimer's Disease' (RADAR‐AD) study is assessing functional decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using remote monitoring techniques (RMT's). Compared to traditional pen‐and‐paper clinical assessments, RMT's can continuously and objectively monitor function during activities of daily living (ADL), which are arguably more sensitive to the earliest stages of AD. The aim of this abstract is to compare the results of the augmented reality task 'Altoida', that recreates an ADL requiring spatial navigation and memory, implemented as a tablet application, between 1) healthy controls, preclinical AD and prodromal AD, and with 2) standard clinical tests for cognitive and functional decline. Method: We included amyloid negative cognitively normal (healthy controls, n=10), amyloid positive cognitively normal (preclinical AD, n=7) and amyloid positive mild cognitive impaired (prodromal AD, n=4) participants (Table 1) from the RADAR‐AD study. The outcome of the Altoida test, consisting of a motor task and two tasks in which participants have to hide‐and‐seek virtual objects, is the validated Neuromotor Index (NMI), with higher scores reflecting normative scoring, according to age, sex and education. Cognition was measured using a word‐list‐learning test, digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Rey complex figure, verbal fluency and Boston naming test. Functional decline was assessed using the Amsterdam Instrumented Activities of Daily Living (AIADL) questionnaire. Result: In our preliminary sub‐sample, healthy controls showed higher NMI scores compared to the preclinical AD and prodromal AD participants (p=0.02) (Figure 1). The NMI was related to the DSST only (Figure 2). Conclusion: NMI scores differed between cognitively normal healthy controls and cognitively normal preclinical AD participants, while no differences could be found in cognitive and functional tests between these groups. The sample size will increase in the coming months, but despite the currently small sample, the preliminary results are promising in evidencing that digital biomarkers are potentially more sensitive than standard clinical tests in detecting the early stages of AD, which could be helpful in developing new endpoints in clinical trials. This work has received support from the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking RADAR‐AD (grant No 806999) and their associated partners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
