| Autor: |
Bustos, Diego Polanco, Landazábal, Nelson Mariño |
| Zdroj: |
Coaching & Sport Science Review; Aug2019, Vol. 27 Issue 78, p21-24, 4p, 1 Color Photograph, 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs |
| Abstrakt: |
In tennis, the high demand and unpredictable duration of matches lead us to examine which are the most efficient methodologies for the development of athletes' endurance. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of the tactical periodization method (game-based) and ATR periodización (traditional periodisation comprising accumulation, transformation and realization phases, i.e. based on training physical abilities in an isolated way) on the technical effectiveness and intermittent endurance in university players to establish the difference in effectiveness between the methods. 16 university tennis players participated in this study; they were then divided into two groups. Both training methods were applied to each group in a different order, measuring the intermittent resistance after each intervention with an intermittent recovery yo-yo test (level-1) and measuring the specific resistance and technical effectiveness by means of the set-test. The results show that the tactical periodization has a positive effect on technical effectiveness, achieving a greater number of successful strokes. This occurs without a lower performance in the intermittent resistance, whereas the ATR method achieves a greater ability to travel greater distances in situations decontextualized from the game. The results give insight to physical trainers on how training of resistance could be developed in game-based situations such as in the tactical periodization method, without neglecting specific resistance which primarily occurs best in isolated training of physical capacities such as with the ATR method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
