| Abstrakt: |
The purpose of this study was comparing the amount of apically extruded irrigation solutions by using various irrigation systems: Canal CleanMax (CCM), SonicMax, RinsEndo, Passive Ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI), and EndoVac irrigation systems Sixty single-rooted mandibular premolars were used. ProTaper was used to instrument the canals up to F4 finishing file. Teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 10). (CCMax, SonicMax, RinsEndo, MNI, PUI and EndoVac). Ten mL final irrigation was made with each irrigation system. Extruded irrigant from the apical foramen was collected into vials. The amount of the extruded irrigation solution was determined by calculating the difference between the initial and final weight of the vials for each group. Results were analyzed by “Kruskal Wallis” and “Conover’s multiple comparison” tests. CCMax and EndoVac groups showed no apical extrusion and these two groups were statistically different from the others significantly (SonicMax, RinsEndo, MNI and PUI systems) (p < 0.05), and no difference was found among SonicMax, MNI, Passive PUI systems (p > 0.05). Maximum apical extrusion was seen with RinsEndo. RinsEndo showed statistically difference from SonicMax and MNI (p < 0.05) but no statistically difference with PUI (p > 0.05). The negative pressure irrigation systems (CCMax and EndoVac) were demonstrated to be significantly more successful and safer in terms of apical extrusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
