Abstrakt: |
Summary Background & aims Body-growth, expressed as weight- and height gain, is a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Whether current historically based recommendations on a high-energy diet are sufficient for optimal growth is questionable. We therefore assessed the longitudinal relation between body-growth and routine energy intake in paediatric CF patients. Methods Included were patients with CF, aged 2–10 years of whom we obtained 969 measurements of weight and height along with dietary records, and 786 coefficient of fat absorption measurements (CFA). We described body-growth, energy intake, macronutrient intake and the long-term effect of energy intake and coefficient of fat absorption on body-growth during the 8-year follow-up period. Results Enrolled were 191 children with CF who had a compromised growth when compared to healthy children. The dietary intake was ≥110% estimated average requirement (EAR) in 47% of the measurements (457/969) and did not (fully) achieve the recommended high-energy level (110–200% EAR). Further, the intake expressed as EAR decreased with increasing age. Cross-sectionally, boys and girls with higher caloric intakes had higher weight-for-age (WFA). The caloric intake explained 18 and 6% of the variation. Further, boys with higher caloric intakes had also higher height-for-age-adjusted-for-target-height (HFA/TH) or BMI. The caloric intake explained 6 or 7% of the variation. Longitudinally, caloric intake was associated with both WFA in boys and girls, and with BMI in boys. Each 100 calories increased intake would result in a 0.01 (girls)–0.02 increase in z -score WFA and 0.03 increase in z -score BMI. We found no significant association between CFA and WFA, HFA/TH or BMI. The contribution of protein, fat and carbohydrates was not associated with WFA, nor with HFA/TH or BMI. Conclusion Even at this relatively early age, a compromised growth in children with CF was found when compared to healthy children. The energy intake was below 110% EAR in 47% of the measurements, and appeared to be insufficient to prevent suboptimal body-growth over the 8-years of follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |