| Autor: |
Expert Panel on Cardiac Imaging:, Shah, Amar B, Kirsch, Jacobo, Bolen, Michael A, Batlle, Juan C, Brown, Richard K J, Eberhardt, Robert T, Hurwitz, Lynne M, Inacio, Joao R, Jin, Jill O, Krishnamurthy, Rajesh, Leipsic, Jonathon A, Rajiah, Prabhakar, Singh, Satinder P, White, Richard D, Zimmerman, Stefan L, Abbara, Suhny |
| Zdroj: |
Journal of the American College of Radiology; Nov2018, Vol. 15 Issue 11, pS283-S290, 8p |
| Abstrakt: |
Chronic chest pain (CCP) of a cardiac etiology is a common clinical problem. The diagnosis and classification of the case of chest pain has rapidly evolved providing the clinician with multiple cardiac imaging strategies. Though scintigraphy and rest echocardiography remain as appropriate imaging tools in the diagnostic evaluation, new technology is available. Current evidence supports the use of alternative imaging tests such as coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), cardiac MRI (CMRI), or Rb-82 PET/CT. Since multiple imaging modalities are available to the clinician, the most appropriate noninvasive imaging strategy will be based upon the patient's clinical presentation and clinical status. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
