A FORCE TO BE RECKONED WITH: CONFRONTING THE (STILL) UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS OF EXCESSIVE FORCE JURISPRUDENCE AFTER KINGSLEY.

Autor:	DiBattista, Michael S.
Předmět:	CONSTITUTIONAL torts POLICE brutality lawsuits KINGSLEY v. Hendrickson (Supreme Court case) BIVENS v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (Supreme Court case) DUE process of law POLICE brutality
Zdroj:	Columbia Human Rights Law Review; Spring2017, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p203-256, 54p
Abstrakt:	The article focuses on the issues of excessive force in the workhorse of modern civil rights litigation in the U.S. focusing on two cases Kingsley v. Hendrickson and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents. Topics include history and development of Section 1983; court's incrementalist approach in developing Section 1983 case law, and use of doctrine of Fourteenth Amendment's substantive due process protections for establishing that excessive force cases should be replaced with an objective standard.
Databáze:	Supplemental Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu