| Autor: |
Tanner, Jean Paul, Salemi, Jason L., Stuart, Amy L., Yu, Haofei, Jordan, Melissa M., DuClos, Chris, Cavicchia, Philip, Correia, Jane A., Watkins, Sharon M., Kirby, Russell S. |
| Zdroj: |
Spatial & Spatio-temporal Epidemiology; May2016, Vol. 17, p117-129, 13p |
| Abstrakt: |
We investigate uncertainty in estimates of pregnant women's exposure to ambient PM 2.5 and benzene derived from central-site monitoring data. Through a study of live births in Florida during 2000–2009, we discuss the selection of spatial and temporal scales of analysis, limiting distances, and aggregation method. We estimate exposure concentrations and classify exposure for a range of alternatives, and compare impacts. Estimated exposure concentrations were most sensitive to the temporal scale of analysis for PM 2.5 , with similar sensitivity to spatial scale for benzene. Using 1–12 versus 3–8 weeks of gestational age as the exposure window resulted in reclassification of exposure by at least one quartile for up to 37% of mothers for PM 2.5 and 27% for benzene. The largest mean absolute differences in concentration resulting from any decision were 0.78 µg/m 3 and 0.44 ppbC, respectively. No bias toward systematically higher or lower estimates was found between choices for any decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Supplemental Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect