Autor: |
Fasbinder, Dennis J., Neiva, Gisele F., Dennison, Joseph B., Heys, Donald R. |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry; Winter2013, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p134-145, 12p |
Abstrakt: |
A number of porcelain materials have demonstrated clinical reliability with a chairside placement CAD/CAM technique (e.g., CEREC). The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the longitudinal clinical performance of a composite resin material (Paradigm) compared to a porcelain material (Vita Mark II) for chairside CAD/CAM-generated adhesive inlays. The inlays were evaluated at six months, one year, two years, three years, six years, and 10 years. Composite resin CAD/CAM inlays performed equally as well as porcelain CAD/CAM inlays after 10 years of clinical service, with clinical advantages noted favoring composite inlays for fracture resistance and better color match to the tooth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|