Comparison of the safety and efficacy of parenteral ticarcillin/clavnlanate and clindamycin/gentamicin in serious intra-abdominal infections.

Autor: Fink, Mitchell P., Helsmoortel, Cathleen M., Arous, Elias J., Doern, Gary V., Moriarty, Kevin P., Fairchild, Patrick G., Townsend, Paula L.
Zdroj: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC); 1989, Vol. 24 Issue suppl_B, p147-156, 10p
Abstrakt: One hundred and twelve patients with proven or suspected serious intra-abdominal infections were randomized for treatment with either ticarcillin/clavulanate (3.1 g every 4 h) or gentamicin (dosage schedule adjusted according to serum concentrations) plus clindamycin (in most cases 900 mg every 8 h). Positive intraperitoneal and/or blood cultures were available in 47 cases. Considering only fully evaluable cases, 15/20 (75%) were clinically cured or improved in the ticarcillin/clavulanate group and 16/25 (64%) in the gentamitin/clindamycin group, the difference not being significant (P > 0.05). Bacteraemia was documented in nine of 45 fully evaluable cases. During the course of the study, the serum creatinine concentration increased by more than 5 mg/1 in only one patient (ticarcillin/clavulanate group). Two patients (one in each group) had apparent allergic reactions. No other drug-related adverse effects were noted. In-vitro sensitivity testing of anaerobic isolates revealed that, of those tested, 5/38, 1/38 and 2/37 were resistant to ticarcillin, ticarcillin/clavulanate and clindamycin, respectively. Among aerobic Gram-negative isolates, 34/78, 6/78 and 4/78 were resistant to ticarcillin, ticarcillin/clavulanate, and gentamicin, respectively. Among aerobic Gram-positive isolates, 2/32, 2/32 and 5/14 were resistant to ticarcillin, ticarcillin/clavulanate, and clindamycin, respectively. We conclude that ticarcillin/clavulanate is a safe and efficacious preparation for treating serious intra-abdominal infections. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Databáze: Complementary Index