| Abstrakt: |
Six simulated progeny test field designs in combination with three within-family selection systems were tested on three loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) progeny test sites in southeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Arkansas, to compare genetic gains for the single trait, height. Residual deviations obtained by subtraction of family and plantation mean effects for each plantation were combined with simulated genetic effects with known family variance structure. The simulated genetic populations, arranged in the following progeny test field designs - large square or almost square plots, five- and ten-tree row plots, five-tree noncontiguous plots, two tree row plots, and single-tree plots - were superimposed on the residual data for each plantation. Within-family selection methods based on deviations from block means, deviations from neighborhood means and deviations from plot means were built into the model. Realized genetic gain attained by each design - selection system combination was compared with the genetic gain theoretically possible if selection accuracy were perfect, and with expected gain estimated using the general linear model. In general, average realized genetic gain compared well with expected gain. Differences between designs with large versus small plots were generally lower than expected, although the single-tree plot design always yielded highest realized gain. Realized gain was generally higher than expected when within-family selection was based on deviations from block or neighborhood means, but equal to or lower than expected when selection was based on deviations from plot means. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full text from SpringerLink