Abstrakt: |
Background: Selection routines for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with symptomatic gallstone disease should give a low frequency of both false-negative ERCP results and residual common bile duct stones (CBDS). Objective: To validate a discriminant function (DF) based on retrospectively collected data, for characterization of patients with symptomatic gallstone disease as regards presence of CBDS, and to compare clinical, ultrasonographic, and DF characterization. Design: Prospective registration of CBDS criteria in consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstone disease. Setting: A department of surgical gastroenterology in a Norwegian central hospital. Patients: One hundred ninety-two patients with gallbladder stones. Intervention: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy or ERCP with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy. Main Outcome Measurements: Sensitivity and specificity of the clinical, ultrasonographic, and DF characterizations, and test of the validity of the DF. Results: Thirty-two patients had CBDS. The clinical criteria of CBDS were present in 152 patients (79.2%): 21.1% of these patients had CBDS and there were no false-negative results (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 25%). The risk of CBDS in patients with normal bile ducts at ultrasonographic examination was 8 of 124, and in patients with dilated ducts or suspected CBDS, 17 of 47 (sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 80%). The DF was positive in 50 patients (26%): 60% of these had CBDS, and there were 2 false-negative results (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 88%). A discriminant analysis of the prospectively registered data selected the same set of CBDS criteria, and a new DF did not alter the characterization of any patient. Conclusions: Clinical characterization had a higher sensitivity for CBDS detection than ultrasonography alone, but a lower specificity. The DF analysis was both more sensitive and specific than ultrasonography, and seemed efficient in selec... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |