Positive and problematic dissertation experiences: The faculty perspective.

Autor:	Knox, Sarah, Burkard, Alan W., Janecek, Julie, Pruitt, Nathan T., Fuller, Shauna L., Hill, Clara E.
Předmět:	CLINICAL psychology CONTENT analysis COUNSELING ACADEMIC dissertations EDUCATIONAL counseling EDUCATORS INTERVIEWING RESEARCH methodology STATISTICAL sampling SOCIAL role SOUND recordings STUDENTS TEACHER-student relationships TEACHER attitudes QUALITATIVE research DOCTORAL programs OCCUPATIONAL roles
Zdroj:	Counselling Psychology Quarterly; Mar2011, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p55-69, 15p, 2 Charts
Abstrakt:	We interviewed 14 clinical and counseling psychology faculty regarding their experiences chairing positive and problematic dissertations. Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research (CQR). Participants reported that advisors' roles involved guiding/facilitating dissertations and helping students shape research ideas; students' roles included taking responsibility, working independently, and maintaining good relationships with the chair/committee. With positive dissertation experiences, chairs and students collaborated before the dissertation, worked together well during the dissertation, and students began the dissertation feeling competent and motivated; such dissertations positively affected participants. Problematic dissertation experiences evinced difficult relationships between chair and student, and students' low research capability; such dissertations negatively affected participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.