| Autor: |
Laurila, J., Standertskjöld-Nordenstam, C.-G., Suramo, I., Tolppanen, E.-M., Tervonen, O., Korhola, O., Brommels, M. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Acta Radiologica; Jan2001, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p96-100, 5p |
| Abstrakt: |
Abstract Objective: To study the efficacy of continuous quality improvement (CQI) compared to ordinary management in an on-duty radiology department. Material and Methods: Because of complaints regarding delivery of on-duty radiological services, an improvement was initiated simultaneously at two hospitals, at the HUCH (Helsinki University Central Hospital) utilising the CQI-method, and at the OUH (Oulu University Hospital) with a traditional management process. For the CQI project, a team was formed to evaluate the process with flow-charts, cause and effect diagrams, Pareto analysis and control charts. Interventions to improve the process were based on the results of these analyses. Results: The team at the HUCH implemented the following changes: A radiologist was added to the evening shift between 15:00–22:00 and a radiographer was moved from the morning shift to 15:00–22:00. A clear improvement was achieved in the turn-around time, but in the follow-up some of the gains were lost. Only minimal changes were achieved at the OUH, where the intervention was based on traditional management processes. Conclusion: CQI was an effective method for improving the quality of performance of a radiology department compared with ordinary management methods, but some of this improvement may be subsequently lost without a continuous measurement system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text