| Abstrakt: |
Rotenone, a pesticide extracted from the root, consistently was reported by a series of investigators to have induced mammary fibroadenomas in female Wistar rats when administered ip or by gavage in a sunflower (SF) oil or SF oil:chloroform vehicle. In contrast, no less than eight bioassays done in other laboratories with rotenone or rotenone-containing powders have given consistently negative carcinogenic results when different strains or species and different modes or vehicles of administration have been used. However, these studies were not designed to address the biological reproducibility of the positive data. Thus, the present study was designed to simulate conditions of the positive studies and to investigate a possible cocarcinogenic interaction between rotenone and chloroform. Each of eight treatment groups was assigned 72 weanling female Wistar rats. Groups were (1) untreated, (2) needle puncture, (3) SF oil: 10% chloroform (SF oil:chloroform), (4) 1.0 mg/kg rotenone in SF oil:chloroform, (5) 2.0 mg%kg rotenone in SF oil:chloroform, (6) SF oil, (7) 1.0 mg/kg rotenone in SF oil, and (8) 2.0 mg/kg rotenone in SF oil. Rats were injected ip 5 days a week for 8 weeks (42 injection days) and subsequently held for 16 months. The appearance of palpable tissue masses was recorded; over 50 tissues from each rat were histologically evaluated. There were no statistically significant differences in overall or individual tumor incidences among control and rotenone treated groups. Specifically, neither incidence nor time-to-palpation of mammary fibroadenoma significantly differed among control and rotenone-treated groups, regardless of the vehicle of administration. Thus, rotenone was not carcinogenic, and rotenone and chloroform did not interact to produce a carcinogenic effect in female Wistar rats in the current study. Thus, previous reports of carcinogenic activity were not reproducible under similar experimental conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
