Promotion of preneoplastic foci in rat liver with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin and a defined mixture of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins.

Autor: Schrenk, Dieter, Buchmann, Albrecht, Dietz, Klaus, Lipp, Hans-Peter, Brunner, Herrmann, Sirma, Huseyin, Münzel, Peter, Hagenmaier, Hanspaul, Gebhardt, Rolf, Bock, Karl Walter
Zdroj: Carcinogenesis; 1994, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p509-515, 7p
Abstrakt: In a two-stage initiation-promotion experiment the hypothesis was investigated that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo--dioxin (TCDD) equivalents (TE), calculated from data of CYP1A induction in hepatocytes in primary culture, or international TCDD equivalents (ITE) are useful for evaluating the tumor-promoting potency of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorodibenzo--dioxin (HpCDD) and of a defined mixture (M2) of 49 polychlorinated dibenzo--dioxins (PCDDs) in comparison with TCDD. Therefore, female Wistar rats were treated with an initiating dose of -nitroso-morpholine, and subsequently received daily doses of 2, 20 and 200 ng TCDD/kg or equivalent doses of HpCDD or M2, based on TE values. After a promotion phase of 13 weeks, hepatic PCDD levels, CYP1A activity and the relative hepatic volume of adenosinetriphosphatase-negative or glutathione S-transferase P-positive preneoplastic foci were determined. After logarithmic transformation, linear PCDD level-response relationships were obtained for induction of CYP1A activity with TCDD, HpCDD or M2. Based on TE values, inducing potencies of both HpCDD and M2 were overestimated at higher doses, whereas induction was approximately equivalent at the lowest dose. The best fit of PCDD level-response relationships of relative hepatic volumes of preneoplastic lesions was achieved using a four-parameter logistic model. Significantly different functions were calculated for promotion with TCDD or HpCDD. It is concluded that (i) different PCDD level-response relationships exist for the induction of hepatic CYP1A activity and the promotion of preneoplastic liver foci, and (ii) that TE or ITE factors provide only a rough estimate of the tumor-promoting potency of a PCDD mixture but may overestimate the risk from exposure to higher-chlorinated 2,3,7,8-substituted congeners such as HpCDD. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Databáze: Complementary Index