Autor: |
Kwok Leung Ong, Tso, Annette W. K., Lam, Karen S. L., Cherny, Stacey S., Pak Chung Sham, Cheung, Bernard M. Y. |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Diabetes Care; Aug2010, Vol. 33 Issue 8, p1856-1858, 3p, 1 Chart |
Abstrakt: |
OBJECTIVE -- To compare the use of GHb and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to define the metabolic syndrome (MetS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-- Data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006 were used. MetS was defined using the consensus criteria in 2009. Raised blood glucose was defined as either FPG ≥100 mg/dl (5.6 mmol/1) or GHb ≥5.7%. RESULTS -- In 2003-2006, there was 91.3% agreement between GHb and FPG when either was used to define MetS. The agreement was good irrespective of age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, and diabetes status (≥87.4%). Similar results were found in 1999-2002. Among subjects without diabetes, only the use of GHb alone, but not FPG, resulted in significant association with cardiovascular diseases (odds ratio 1.45, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS -- Using GHb instead of FPG to define MetS is feasible. It also identifies individuals with increased cardiovascular risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|