| Abstrakt: |
Mello, L. G. S., and Rose, G. A. 2009. The acoustic dead zone: theoretical vs. empirical estimates, and its effect on density measurements of semi-demersal fish. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 1364–1369.The height of the acoustic dead zone, the region near the seabed where fish cannot be resolved acoustically, was calculated both theoretically (DZt) and empirically (DZe). The DZe was based on measurements of depth and trawl geometry from sensors (SCANMAR) mounted on a bottom trawl deployed during a survey off Newfoundland and Labrador in winter 2007. Acoustic data were acquired while trawling, using a 38-kHz echosounder (Simrad EK500) with a hull-mounted transducer. The DZe was calculated as the difference between the trawl-footrope depth and the corresponding acoustically sensed, seabed depth. EK500 and SCANMAR estimates of seabed depth were significantly different. The fish caught were mostly Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). The estimates of DZe ranged between 2.0 and 3.5 m and were greater than DZt by 0.1–0.9 m in more than half the cases. Three values of acoustically derived cod densities were estimated for each tow, without dead-zone correction and with corrections for DZt and DZe. When compared with DZt corrections, DZe resulted in negative (6–12%) and positive (9–35%) corrections to cod density. A general linear model revealed that the seabed depth gradient, standard deviation of estimated fish density in the dead zone, and wind direction and force explained 85% of the difference between DZt and DZe estimates. These factors affected the detection of the seabed and biased acoustically derived indices of demersal-fish abundance. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
