| Autor: |
Dourado Loguercio, Alessandro, Roberto de Oliveira Bauer, José, Reis, Alessandra, Miranda Grande, Rosa Helena |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Quintessence International; Jan2004, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p29-34, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
Objectives: To evaluate The microleakage in Class II resin restorations at different margins and the polymerization shrinkage of the composites used. Method and materials: Four standardized Class II (3 x 5 x 2 mm) cavities were prepared in 32 teeth. The sample had the gingival margin either 1 mm below or above the cementoenamel junction. Teeth were divided and restored according to the following protocols: (1) Single Bond + P60;(2) Prime & Bond NT + Surefil; (3) Bond-1 + Alert; and (4) Prime & Bond 2.1 + TPH. After 7 days, the specimens were thermocycled (500 cycles between 5 to 55 ° C with a 15-second dwell time), immersed in 0.5% methylene blue for 24 hours, sectioned, and evaluated (both surfaces) at the gingival margin by two examiners, using a 0 to 3 marginal infiltration score system. The polymerization shrinkage of the composites (n = 6) was evaluated by the disk deflective method. Microleakage data was evaluated by nonparametrlc repeated measures ANOVA. The percentage of polymerization shrinkage was evaluated by ANOVA and Tukey's lest. Results: Only protocol 3 showed a significant difference between enamel and cementum margin. No difference was detected among the protocols in the enamel margin. Only protocol 1 provided a good seal in the cementum margin. All packable composites showed lower polymerization shrinkage than the hybrid tested. Conclusion: All protocols are able to prevent dye penetration in enamel margins; however, protocol 1 is preferable to reduce the microleakage in the cementum margin. The packable composites showed lower polymerization shrinkage compared to the hybrid resin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
