| Autor: |
Geitel, Birgit, Kwiatkowski, Ralf, Zimmer, Stefan, Barthel, Claudia R., Roulet, Jean-François, Jahn, Klaus-Roland |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry; 2004, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p247-253, 7p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 4 Graphs |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: The quality of fillings consisting of a hybrid composite was compared with fillings consisting of two different microfilled composites in a clinical examination. Material and Methods: Within the design of a clinically controlled two-year study conducted under practice-relevant conditions, the composites C-Fill MH (Megadenta), Helio Progress (Vivadent), and Visio-Dispers (ESPE) were examined in anterior-tooth cavities in 134 patients by means of the split-mouth technique. The clinical examinations were performed based on modified Ryge criteria (marginal integrity, anatomical form, secondary caries, color, marginal discoloration, surface roughness) after 12 and 24 months. Results: Immediately following filling application, all evaluation criteria except color were assessed as level A. After 12 and 24 months, C-Fill MH was found to be significantly superior to the other materials with regard to marginal integrity, color, and marginal discoloration. Conclusion: The hybrid composite C-Fill MH seems to be superior to the microfilled composites and should therefore be preferred as a restorative filling material. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
