| Autor: |
Valentin, Antonio, Hindocha, Neeti, Osei-Lah, Abeena, Fisniku, Leonora, McCormick, David, Asherson, Phillip, Moran, Nicholas, Makoff, Andrew, Nashef, Lina |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Epilepsia (Series 4); Nov2007, Vol. 48 Issue 11, p2187-2190, 4p, 2 Charts |
| Abstrakt: |
In a cohort of 275 Caucasians with a broad IGE phenotype, patients with absences were classified. Criteria of the 1989 Commission on Classification of the International League Against Epilepsy for Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE 1989 criteria) were compared with the stricter criteria of the ILAE Task Force for Classification and Terminology (CAE 2005 criteria). Among the 129 patients with absences without significant myoclonus, 50 had juvenite absence epilepsy 44 had CAE according to the CAE 1989 criteria and only 30 had CAE according to the CAE 2005 criteria. We found a significantly better outcome in patients considered as CAE by the CAE 2005 criteria, compared with those excluded. Strict criteria for classification of absence syndromes leave many patients unclassified. However, diagnostic criteria used to classify CAE patients have prognostic significance. We propose that patients are classified as having benign CAE or as having CAE with the adverse prognostic factors indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text