| Autor: |
TAK MAO CHAN, AI WU LIN, SYDNEY CW TANG, JIA QI QIAN, MAN FAI LAM, YIU WING HO, KAI CHUNG TSE, KWOK WAH CHAN, KAR NENG LAI, COLIN SO TANG |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Nephrology; Dec2007, Vol. 12 Issue 6, p576-581, 6p, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 1 Graph |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: Retrospective and anecdotal data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might be effective when given as rescue therapy for membranous nephropathy (MN). Prospective controlled data on MMF and prednisolone as primary therapy are lacking. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of MMF and prednisolone as primary treatment in MN with nephrotic syndrome. MMF and prednisolone given for 6 months was compared against a modified Ponticelli regimen in 20 patients, with follow up of 15 months. Results: MMF with prednisolone and the comparative immunosuppressive regimen showed similar efficacy in proteinuria reduction, despite a lower cumulative prednisolone dose in the MMF group (3.80 ± 0.28 vs 9.93 ± 0.25 g, P < 0.001). Remission (composite of ‘complete’ and ‘partial’) rates were 63.6% and 66.7% in the MMF group and control group, respectively ( P = 1.000). Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance remained stable during follow up. Cumulative relapse rate was 23.1% at 2 years. Chlorambucil resulted in more leucopenia compared with MMF. Conclusion: Data from this pilot study indicate that more than 60% of patients with MN and nephrotic syndrome respond to combined MMF and prednisolone treatment, and suggest potential benefits of MMF as being steroid-sparing and having less adverse effects compared with other commonly used cytotoxic agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
