| Autor: |
Dag Torfoss, E. Arne Høiby, Jon Magnus Tangen, Harald Holte, Kåre Bø, Peter Meyer, Kjell Grøttum, Kjetil Weyde, Grete Fossum Lauritzsen, Berit Sandstad, Anne-Birgitte Jacobsen, Harald Olsen, Stein Kvaløy |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC); Mar2007, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p711-711, 1p |
| Abstrakt: |
Objectives Penicillin G with an aminoglycoside is the standard initial empirical treatment in febrile neutropenia in Norway. It has been argued that giving the aminoglycoside once daily to neutropenic patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia may be hazardous when penicillin G is the β-lactam antibiotic. We questioned this argument and hypothesized that tobramycin once daily was as efficacious as three times daily. Methods We conducted a randomized prospective multicentre study, comparing the efficacy of tobramycin 6 mg/kg once (arm A) versus three times (arm B) daily, plus penicillin G 5 million IU × 4, in febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Primary outcome: modification of the antibiotic regimen. Results One hundred and seventy-four patients were evaluable for intention-to-treat analyses. One hundred and fifty-five patients had lymphoma or leukaemia as the underlying cancer diagnosis. In arm A, 35 of 88 patients and in arm B, 34 of 86 patients, that is 40% in both arms had no modification of the antibiotic regimen. No patients died while participating in the study. Upon modification of the antibiotic regimen, all patients were successfully treated. The increase in serum creatinine was modest and similar in the two treatment groups. Conclusions When administered with penicillin G, tobramycin given once daily was as efficacious and safe as tobramycin given three times daily in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia in Norway, provided the regimen was modified according to the clinical response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
