| Abstrakt: |
A unique (synapomorphic) characteristic of astigmatic mites is the heteromorphic deuteronymph also called hypopus. It is a non-feeding and facultative instar between protonymph and tritonymph. The hypopus is adapted for dispersal and sometimes also for dormancy, as in Lepidoglyphus destructor. The experiments reveal a correlation between the composition of the foodstuff, the duration of development of homomorphic instars, the mortality of protonymphs and the production of hypopodes. As food quality decreases, development lasts longer, mortality increases and hypopodes are produced in greater numbers. Disadvantageous trophic conditions of varied chemical nature favour the induction of hypopodes. The experimental data show that hypopus incidences (as percentage individuals of a population) depend on the relative proportions of constituents of an ingested foodstuff. What matters is the ratio between nourishing foodstuff components and those that are of little or no nutritional value. When a certain ratio does not meet a presumed metabolically required level of nutrients a nutritional deficiency results and hypopus induction is triggered, provided that adequate genetic propensities for hypopus production are present (L. destructor is highly polymorphic for hypopus production). Specific key substances are apparently not involved, and composite properties of a foodstuff are crucial for hypopus induction. Decrease of food quality (not poor food per se) during the hypopus-inducible period (late larval to early protonymphal phase) promotes hypopus induction. The interpretation matches the ecological scene. When trophic deterioration of a patch habitat sets in, often as a result of overcrowding, conditions will eventually become untenable. As a response to incurring nutritional deficiencies the mites will induce hypopodes, which provide for escape from or survival at the decaying habitat patch. Experiments support the threshold model of quantitative genetics for hypopus expression as previously inferred from other experiments with L. destructor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full text from SpringerLink