Pressurized Hot Water and DTPA‐Sorbitol as Viable Alternatives for Soil Boron Extraction. I. Boron‐Treated Soil Incubation and Efficiency of Extraction.

Autor: Shiffler, A. K., Jolley, V. D., Christopherson, J. E., Webb, B. L., Farrer, D. C., Haby, V. A.
Předmět:
Zdroj: Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis; 2005, Vol. 36 Issue 15/16, p2179-2187, 9p
Abstrakt: Serious challenges associated with hot water extraction, the standard extraction method for water‐soluble boron (B), limit its use in commercial soil‐testing laboratories. Several alternatives to make B testing more practical have been proposed and studied; none of the alternatives have readily replaced the hot water method. Two relatively new, promising B extraction methods are pressurized hot water and DTPA‐Sorbitol. Very little reported work compares B extraction values obtained from the standard hot water extraction method and these two alternative methods. This study was conducted to complete an initial step in validating new procedures—extracting the designated nutrient from fertilized, incubated soils by using standard and alternative extraction methods and comparing the resulting values. The three extraction methods were used to extract B from samples of calcareous sand and silt loam soils and limed, loamy fine sand, all which had been treated with 10 levels of B (0–8 mg kg -1 ) and incubated for 7 and 28 days. The amount of B extracted increased as the rate of B application increased with all three soil‐extraction methods. High correlations (r 0.977–0.999) were observed between extractable B and rate of B application with all three procedures. Correlations between the amount of extractable B using hot water extraction and the value obtained with an alternative extraction method were similar for both methods (r=0.89). Hot water generally extracted the least and pressurized hot water the most B regardless of soil type, rate of application, or duration of incubation. This study suggests the more easily used methods of pressurized hot water and DTPA‐Sorbitol could be recommended as replacements to the cumbersome hot water extraction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index