| Autor: |
Fatima, Tanveer, Deshpande, Sumit Jairao, Rajore, Charupriya, Qayum, Syed Abdul, Poojaraj, Safoora, Syeda, Sheshnag, G. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer; Jul-Dec2024, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p2627-2642, 16p |
| Abstrakt: |
There are numerous retraction agents used in chemico mechanical method of gingival retraction. Aluminium chloride which is more commonly used for gingival retraction produces efficient retraction but they have been also reported to cause collateral soft tissue damage due to its low pH whereas oxymetazoline, which were reported as safer vasoconstrictors and retraction agents in literature have very little scientific evidence regarding its efficacy. Aim: - The purpose of the study was to know how much amount of retraction was achievable with safer retraction agents: Oxymetazoline and Aluminium chloride which is more commonly used and is more efficient in retraction, so that a retraction agent which is effective in retraction as well as safer to use can be known. Materials and methods: - Gingival retraction cords 0, 00, 000, Retraction medicaments aluminium chloride, oxymetazoline, Blotting paper, Electronic analytical balance, Artificial saliva, human plasma. 30 samples of length 6cm are cut of size 0,00, 000. Divided into 3 groups of 10 samples each. Dry will be dipped directly in human plasma and saliva for 10 minutes. 10 were dipped in medicaments for 20 minutes, further these samples were divided into a grop of 5. 5 were dipped in plasma and 5 were dipped in saliva for 10 minutes. Results: -When immersed in medicaments, there is a significant difference in absorption of fluids (artificial saliva and plasma) between the untreated dry cord and the cord treated with aluminium chloride and oxymetazoline chloride. The fluid absorbency was better in retraction cord 000, dipped in aluminium chloride and then dipped in human plasma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
