| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: To compare and assess the visual, refractive, and tomographic results of patients with corneal ectasia treated with either corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS) or synthetic intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) without concomitant corneal cross-linking. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 34 eyes with CAIRS were matched to 34 eyes with ICRS using the propensity score matching technique. Each group was matched on a oneto-one basis using multiple parameters such as central corneal thickness, vertical and horizontal coma, maximum anterior keratometry, steepest keratometry, and age. Visual, refractive, topographic, and aberrometric data were measured at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Results: Initial preoperative parameters were similar between the two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement at last follow-up time in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (0.52 ± 0.23 to 0.16 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], P <.001; 0.44 ± 0.27 to 0.17 ± 0.21 logMAR, P <.001), topographic astigmatism (4.45 ± 2.75 to 3.14 ± 1.93 diopters [D], P =.001; 3.66 ± 2.22 to 2.36 ± 1.46 D, P =.007), maximum anterior keratometry (55.85 ± 7.53 to 50.69 ± 6.38 D, P <.001; 54.59 ± 6.95 to 50.71 ± 4.51 D, P =.003), and vertical coma (1.49 ± 1.02 to 0.38 ± 0.65 D, P <.001; 1.22 ± 0.75 to 0.52 ± 0.57 D, P <.001) for CAIRS and ICRS, respectively. The improvements observed in both groups at the last follow-up visit were comparable; however, the CAIRS group demonstrated a higher percentage of eyes gaining two or more Snellen lines of CDVA (60% vs 31.58%, P =.04), and a greater magnitude of reduction in vertical coma compared to the ICRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. No major complications were observed with both groups, and one eye lost one CDVA line in the ICRS group. The mean thickness of the CAIRS segments at the last follow-up visit was 401.06 ± 100.12 µm, compared to 435.29 ± 26.19 µm for ICRS. Both CAIRS and ICRS demonstrated significant compression of stromal thickness above the segment (36.19% and 32.00%, respectively). Conclusions: When adequately matched for preoperative disease type and severity, eyes with CAIRS had a similar and notable clinical improvement compared to ICRS, with possibly better improvement in vertical coma and CDVA. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(11):e863–e876.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
