The Synergistic Effects of Different Phosphorus Sources: Ferralsols Promoted Soil Phosphorus Transformation and Accumulation.

Autor: Zhou, Long, Zhao, Tilei, Thu, Nyeinnyein, Zhao, Hongmin, Zheng, Yi, Tang, Li
Předmět:
Zdroj: Agronomy; Oct2024, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p2372, 15p
Abstrakt: Phosphorus (P) application can enhance soil P availability and alter P fractions. However, the P accumulation and transformation of different P sources in low-phosphorus red soil remain unclear. Two-year (2018–2019) field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of five P source treatments (CK—no phosphorus; SSP—superphosphate; MAP—calcium–magnesium phosphate; DAP—monoammonium phosphate; and CMP—diammonium phosphate) on the P accumulation of maize and soil P fractions in low-P red soil using the Hedley Sequential Method. The results showed that P application significantly increased P uptake, Olsen-P, total phosphorus, and most of the soil P fractions. Compared to the CMP, MAP, and DAP treatments, SSP had a relatively higher P accumulation and labile P pool, with a slightly lower moderately labile P pool. The SSP treatment mainly increased soil-available P content and crop P uptake by increasing the labile P pool (resin-P and NaHCO3-Pi) and reducing the moderately labile P pool and non-labile P pool. The P activation coefficient (PAC%) and Olsen-P were positively correlated with labile P (resin-P, NaHCO3-Pi, and NaHCO3-Po) and moderately labile P (NaOH-Pi and 1 M HCl-Pi) and negatively correlated with Fe2O3 and Al2O3. The results suggest that SSP has a priority effect on the crop P uptake and soil P availability in low-P red soil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje