| Abstrakt: |
This in vitro investigation aimed to compare the trueness, precision, internal fit, and marginal adaptation of Varseo Smile Crown Plus (VSCP), CROWNTEC (C), and milled Enamic crowns (E) using a 5-axis dental milling machine (prograMill PM7). 39 crowns (VSCP, E, C; n = 13) were designed and fabricated. Internal/marginal adaptation, precision, and trueness were assessed via die scans with/without a fit checker. Dimensional discrepancies were determined by superimposing the scans. One-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) analyzed the results. No significant differences were found in internal fit or marginal adaptation between groups. However, group E exhibited the best fit (axial: 82.9 µm). Trueness differed significantly (p < 0.05) across all groups and areas. Group E had the highest trueness (intaglio: 25.8 µm), while VSCP had the lowest (marginal: 31.9 µm). Precision varied significantly within the occlusal area of printed groups (highest for C: 17.8 µm) and the marginal area between printed/milled (VSCP vs. E) and C vs. E (lowest for E: 20.5 µm, highest for VSCP: 27.9 µm). In conclusion, both milled and 3D-printed crowns achieved comparable internal fit and marginal adaptation. However, group E displayed superior fit and trueness. While C exhibited higher occlusal precision, E had higher marginal precision. These findings suggest the potential for 3D-printed hybrid polymer crowns, warranting further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
