| Abstrakt: |
The role of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in treating large core ischemic stroke remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and safety of EVT with or without bridging IVT in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) and baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≤ 5. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception until November 2023. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2). Secondary outcomes included 90-day independent ambulation (mRS 0–3), successful recanalization, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) and 90-day mortality. A random-effects model was used for data pooling. Five high-quality studies, incorporating 2124 patients (41% treated with bridging IVT), were included. Across both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, no significant differences were found between the bridging IVT and EVT-alone groups in terms of functional independence (odds ratios [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90–2.07, P = 0.14; adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.68–2.09, P = 0.53) or independent ambulation (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.80–1.62, P = 0.47; aOR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00–1.39, P = 0.05) at 90 days. Furthermore, no differences were observed in successful recanalization, any ICH, sICH, and 90-day mortality between the two treatment groups. Bridging IVT exhibits similar functional and safety outcomes compared to EVT alone in ACLVO patients with baseline ASPECTS ≤ 5. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full text from SpringerLink