Autor: |
Wei, Xiao, Zhao, Yun, Yan, Wenyue, Dai, Qigang, Wu, Hui, Miao, Yang, Huang, Lei, Liu, Qing, Zhang, Xuyao, Wang, Hongxia, Liu, Yanan, Zhang, Linlin |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
OncoTargets & Therapy; Aug2024, Vol. 17, p629-642, 14p |
Abstrakt: |
Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. Results: A total of 145 patients were included in this study. Median PFS (mPFS) was 3.53 months for the apatinib group and 5.3 months for the anlotinib group (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41– 0.84; P = 0.004), and median OS (mOS) was 7.6 months versus 15.6 months (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46– 1.00; P = 0.048), which all showed significant differences after adjusting for confounders (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that the presence or absence of bone metastases significantly influenced PFS in both treatment groups. The ORR was 3.03% in the anlotinib group versus 10.13% in the apatinib group (P = 0.12), the DCR was 72.73% versus 51.90% (P = 0.21). No unanticipated adverse events (AEs) were observed. The incidence of grade 3– 4 AEs was significantly higher in the apatinib group (31.65% vs 13.64%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Anlotinib demonstrated greater efficacy and safety compared to apatinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with bone metastases and EGFR(-). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje |
K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.
|