| Abstrakt: |
Objectively measure MVPA. IPAQ MVPA was calculated both including and excluding walking physical activity. MVPA measures were compared by limits of agreement approach, Pearson correlations and concordance correlations. Results: We recruited 240 participants with type 1 diabetes and 343 participants with type 2 diabetes for the study. In people with type 1 diabetes, there were no concordance correlations between IPAQ MVPA, both including (rho = − 0.011 (− 0.038, 0.017), p = 0.444) and excluding (rho = − 0.001 (− 0.067, 0.065), p = 0.978) walking physical activity. MVPA measured by IPAQ was 43.3(− 85.6, 172.2) min/day higher than accelerometer-measured MVPA, when including walking, and 8.88(− 60.4, 78.2) min/day higher, when excluding walking. In people with type 2 diabetes, there were significant positive concordance correlations between IPAQ MVPA, both including (rho = 0.038 (0.02, 0.06), p < 0.001) and excluding (rho = 0.34 (0.27, 0.41), p < 0.001) walking physical activity. MVPA measured by IPAQ was 62.3 (95% CI − 61.5 to 186.0) min/day higher than accelerometer-measured MVPA, when including walking, and 4.0 (95% CI − 34.1 to 42.0) min/day higher, when excluding walking. Conclusion: In people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, caution should be exercised when using the Arabic version of the IPAQ to measure MVPA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
