Evaluation of minimally invasive esthetic crown lengthening using an open flap versus flapless surgical approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Autor:	Sourour, Marie‐line, Tawfik, Omnia Khaled, Hosny, Manal, Fawzy El‐Sayed, Karim Mohamed
Předmět:	GINGIVECTOMY RESEARCH funding COSMETIC dentistry STATISTICAL sampling POSTOPERATIVE pain QUESTIONNAIRES DENTAL crowns CORRECTIVE orthodontics MINIMALLY invasive procedures TREATMENT effectiveness RANDOMIZED controlled trials SURGICAL flaps TOOTH eruption PATIENT satisfaction HEALTH outcome assessment REGRESSION analysis PIEZOSURGERY
Zdroj:	Journal of Esthetic & Restorative Dentistry; Oct2024, Vol. 36 Issue 10, p1353-1362, 10p
Abstrakt:	Objectives: Esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) is commonly advocated to treat patients with altered passive eruption (APE). Since the introduction of the minimally invasive surgical concept, a limited number of studies have investigated this technique in a standardized manner, with further studies required to verify the validity and predictability of the minimally invasive FL‐technique. The current randomized trial compares a minimally invasive (ECL), using piezosurgery with flapless‐approach (FL), versus an open‐flap (OF) approach in the management of patients with APE Type 1B. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐four patients diagnosed with APE Type 1B were randomly assigned into test (FL) with tunneling approach or control (OF) group with minimally invasive flap reflection (n = 12/group). Postoperative pain was assessed during the first 48 h. Gingival margin (GM) level relative to a custom‐made stent (rGM) and patient satisfaction were assessed preoperative, immediately after surgery, at 3 and 6 months postsurgically. Postoperative swelling was reported for the first week postsurgically. Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD) and pink esthetic score (PES), were evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Linear regression analysis was conducted for pain. Results: OF‐group reported significantly higher pain and swelling scores than FL‐group during the first 48 h (p < 0.05). FL‐group showed no significant differences regarding rGM between 3 and 6 months, in contrast to OF‐group, where a significant decrease in rGM was notable (p < 0.05). No significant differences in PI, BoP, CAL, PD, PES, and patient satisfaction scores were evident between groups (p > 0.05). Regression analysis demonstrated that treatment and gender were significant predictors for pain (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Within the current study's limitations, piezo‐surgical ECL with FL‐approach presented significantly lower postoperative pain, swelling, and early GM stability compared to OF‐approach. Clinical Significance: Piezosurgical ECL with a FL‐approach can be considered a predictable technique with advantages over the OF‐approach in the management of patients with APE Type1B. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text