| Abstrakt: |
Contacting forests in different ways and conducting public perception evaluations of forests are important ways to evaluate forest construction. In order to explore the differences between on-site and manual post-collection indoor evaluations in forest landscape surveys, we combined subjective evaluation and objective indicator monitoring (eye movement characteristics, physiological indicators) based on different forest observation scales. We compared and analyzed the suitability of the following four visual approaches: on-site observation, manual collection, followed by indoor viewing normal photos (NP), videos (VD), and virtual reality panoramas (VR), in terms of public preference, perception, and psychological emotion. The results showed the following: (1) Compared with the on-site evaluation, the three indoor visual approaches (NP, VD, and VR) showed no significant difference in "landscape beauty" and "spatial perception". VD also showed no significant difference in "landscape perception", "seeing", and "plant color preference" and had the strongest substitution for site evaluation. (2) With the exception of small-scale landscapes, in which on-site evaluation showed no substitutability, for the rest of the landscape scales, each of the three indoor visual approaches showed substitutability for on-site evaluation to varying degrees. (3) When conducting physiological and psychological surveys, watching videos and VR are more ideal. In terms of eye tracking, VR is closest to on-site observation. Practice shows that video was closer to on-site observation in most landscape preferences and perceptions. VR was suitable for presenting public visual behavioral characteristics, and NP showed some advantages in landscape beauty and spatial perceptions. The findings of the study can provide a scientific basis for the selection of visual approaches in future landscape evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
