| Autor: |
Kokubu, Yasuhiko, Kawahara, Shinya, Mizu‐Uchi, Hideki, Hamai, Satoshi, Akasaki, Yukio, Sato, Taishi, Ishibashi, Shojiro, Konishi, Toshiki, Nakashima, Yasuharu |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics; Jul2024, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p1-13, 13p |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: This study assessed rotational mismatch between components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the supine and standing positions and aimed to investigate the effect of rotational mismatch in the standing position on postoperative patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: Seventy‐one patients (71 knees) who underwent TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis were used to investigate rotational mismatches between components. Rotational mismatches between components were examined on postoperative standing whole‐leg and supine knee radiographs using a three‐dimensional‐to‐two‐dimensional model image registration technique, and the angles between the reference axes of the components were measured. Component alignment was evaluated using postoperative computed tomography images, and a questionnaire (2011 version of the Knee Society Score: [KSS 2011]) was mailed to investigate postoperative PROMs. Results: In the entire cohort, rotational mismatches in the supine and standing positions were similar (p = 0.9315). In 15% of patients, the mismatch was large (>5°) in the supine position but small (<5°) in the standing position (overestimated group). However, in 23% of patients, the mismatch was small (<5°) in the supine position and large (>5°) in the standing position (underestimated group). The underestimated group had severe preoperative varus deformity, resulting in external rotation of both femoral and tibial components. Rotational mismatch in the standing position (p = 0.0032) was a significant risk factor for unfavourable PROMs. Patients with a mismatch in the standing position had significantly lower scores than those without a mismatch (p = 0.0215), exceeding the minimal clinically important difference values. Conclusions: The underestimated group is clinically important because the surgical procedure and intraoperative assessment of component placement are performed in the supine position. In cases of severe preoperative varus deformity, care should be taken not to place the component in malrotation to avoid rotational mismatch in the standing position. Level of Evidence: Ⅳ, Case series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text