| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: To evaluate inlay and onlay marginal adapta2on of two different ceramic materials using two intracoronal prepara2on designs. Materials and Methods: An examina2on of the marginal adap2on of two materials--lithium disilicate (LD; IPS e.max CAD) and polymer infiltrated ceramic network material (PICN; Vita Enamic)--and two prepara2on designs, where D1 represents MOD inlay prepara2on with no cusp reduc2on and for D2, in addi2on to the basic MOD prepara2on, the buccal cusps (func2onal cusps) were reduced by 1.5 mm. Four sub-groups (LD-D1, LD-D2, PICN-D1, PICN-D2) were conducted. In total, 40 (n = 40) mandibular molars were used. A stereomicroscope was used to assess the marginal gap before, aWer cementa2on and aWer thermocycling. Values were calculated for the mean, median, SD, minimum, maximum, and 95% CI. Pairwise comparisons using Tukey post-hoc test were performed following an ANOVA significance of P = .05. Results: The results revealed that lithium disilicate showed sta2s2cally significantly higher mean gap distance than PICN material (61 µm to 99 µm). Pairwise comparisons showed that D2 design has sta2s2cally significant higher mean gap values than D1. Conclusions: Both LD and PICN material provided marginal adapta2on within clinical accepted range. PICN material restora2ons provided beer fit than lithium disilicate restora2ons. Cusp coverage has a greater marginal gap compared to conven2onal prepara2on. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
