| Abstrakt: |
The article compares the departure from plain language of the statute of limitations under Idaho Code Section 5-219(4) to common law completed tort theory. Topics discussed include accrual at the time of tortious act or omission, accrual based on factual patterns, court failure to define damage in misdiagnosis injury cases, consequences of the departure from the plain language, abrogation of the completed tort theory in 2011, and permission of accrual before damage under the Idaho Constitution. |
