Equivalence and test–retest reliability of Tulu sentence lists for measuring speech recognition threshold in noise among individuals with sensorineural hearing loss.
Autor: | Miranda, Arolin Blossom, Kalaiah, Mohan Kumar, Shastri, Usha |
---|---|
Předmět: |
LANGUAGE & languages
CROSS-sectional method PEARSON correlation (Statistics) NOISE SENSORINEURAL hearing loss HUMAN beings KRUSKAL-Wallis Test DESCRIPTIVE statistics ODDS ratio STATISTICAL reliability SPEECH audiometry INTRACLASS correlation FRIEDMAN test (Statistics) DATA analysis software CONFIDENCE intervals REGRESSION analysis |
Zdroj: | Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology; 9/17/2024, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p1-8, 8p |
Abstrakt: | Background: The difficulty in understanding speech becomes worse in the presence of background noise for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Speech-in-noise tests help to assess this difficulty. Previously, the Tulu sentence lists have been assessed for their equivalency to measure speech recognition threshold in noise among individuals with normal hearing. The present study aimed to determine the equivalence and test–retest reliability of Tulu sentence lists for measuring speech recognition threshold in noise among individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. Results: The SNR-50 was measured for 13 sentence lists in 20 Tulu-speaking individuals with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Retesting was done by administering all lists to eight participants after an average of 25.25 days (SD = 19.44). Friedman test was administered to check for the list equivalency. Intraclass correlation coefficient was measured to assess test–retest reliability. A regression analysis was performed to understand the influence of pure-tone average on SNR-50. A Kruskal–Wallis test was administered to check the statistical significance of the SNR-50 obtained across different configurations and degrees of hearing loss. Nine of the 13 Tulu sentence lists (lists 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13) were equivalent in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss. The mean SNR-50 for these nine lists was 1.13 dB (SD = 2.04 dB). The test–retest reliability was moderate (ICC = 0.727). The regression analysis showed that a pure-tone average accounted for 24.7% of the variance in SNR-50 data (p = 0.026). Individuals with mild to moderate hearing loss obtained the worst SNR-50, followed by mild and high-frequency hearing loss. Conclusion: Nine Tulu sentence lists are equivalent and reliable and can be used to measure speech recognition threshold in noise among individuals with sensorineural hearing loss who are Tulu speakers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: | Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |