| Abstrakt: |
While the M-Carry look-ahead adder increases speed and decreases power consumption, the M-Kogee Stone Adder does the exact opposite. Twenty volunteers were employed for the study, with ten assigned to Group 1 and ten to Group 2, to improve the high-speed adder's power reduction and speed increase capabilities. Despite sharing the same number of samples (N=10), the M-Kogee Stone Adder achieves better high-speed adding performance with less power consumption than the M-Carry look-ahead adder. The latency of M-Carry look-ahead adders is 2.283 nanoseconds, which is slower than that of the M-Kogee Stone Adders, which is 2.288 nanoseconds. The area value is calculated by the M-Carry look-ahead adder utilizing 29 LUTs, whereas the M-Kogee Stone adder uses just 26. The 9.37 mw of the M-Carry look-ahead adder is much less powerful than the 11.14 mw of the M-Kogee Stone Adder. A significant difference is seen when comparing Area, Delay, and Power side by side (P=0.0298, 0.0348, and 0.0429). Carr look-ahead adders outperform M-Kogee Stone Adders in terms of space limitations, latency, power consumption, and performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
