| Abstrakt: |
Examining the effects of radiation on humans, this study contrasts an older 5*5 dipole array antenna with a modern 4*4 antenna that increases the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). Two sets of samples were used for the statistical analysis. Forty tissue samples were provided by researchers from two separate organizations. Two groups of dipole arrays were employed to build the antennas: one group used 5X5 arrays and the other group used the more modern 4*4 arrays. We use G-power 0.8, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 0.2, and a 95% confidence interval to estimate the sample size. Antennas are deemed effective when the significance level is lower than 0.05. Consequently, a 4*4 dipole array antenna has a SAR that is 0.4328 times higher than a 5*5 models. A statistically significant influence (p<0.05) was shown by the research, with a p-value of 0.0735. Instead of 5*5 arrays, researchers now employ 4*4 dipole array antennas to monitor Specific Absorption Rates (SARs), which helps them understand radiation's effects on humans better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
