| Autor: |
Forester, Summer, Jett, Janel, Holtey, Bjorn |
| Zdroj: |
PS: Political Science & Politics; Jul2024, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p440-446, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
Simulations are increasingly prominent in classrooms, and research shows that such activities provide an array of benefits. In general, simulations tend to situate students as "lab rats" (Asal 2005) who get to discuss the experiment. We call for bringing students into a simulation not as lab rats but instead as "mad scientists." We specifically propose using a simulation's debriefing step as an opportunity for students to imagine how they might revise the simulation that they experienced and to defend their revisions using concepts from class. We argue that such student-led revisions cultivate agentic engagement , a form of engagement in which students recognize themselves as co-constructors of knowledge with and for their peers. To test this notion, we modified the "Isle of Ted" with an expanded post-simulation debriefing. We found that our approach cultivated student engagement and buy-in, required students to think of concepts dynamically, and was relatively simple to implement. Our study contributes to the literature on simulations as effective and engaging classroom tools, and it also emphasizes the potential for simulations to spark agentic learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
