Reliability, validity and acceptability of an online clinical reasoning simulator for medical students: An international pilot.

Autor: Hornos, Eduardo, Pleguezuelos, Eduardo, Bala, Laksha, Collares, Carlos Fernando, Freeman, Adrian, van der Vleuten, Cees, Murphy, Kevin G., Sam, Amir H.
Předmět:
Zdroj: Medical Teacher; Sep2024, Vol. 46 Issue 9, p1220-1227, 8p
Abstrakt: Introduction: Clinical reasoning skills are essential for decision-making. Current assessment methods are limited when testing clinical reasoning and management of uncertainty. This study evaluates the reliability, validity and acceptability of Practicum Script, an online simulation-based programme, for developing medical students' clinical reasoning skills using real-life cases. Methods: In 2020, we conducted an international, multicentre pilot study using 20 clinical cases with 2457 final-year medical students from 21 schools worldwide. Psychometric analysis was performed (n = 1502 students completing at least 80% of cases). Classical estimates of reliability for three test domains (hypothesis generation, hypothesis argumentation and knowledge application) were calculated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients. Validity evidence was obtained by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and measurement alignment (MA). Items from the knowledge application domain were analysed using cognitive diagnostic modelling (CDM). Acceptability was evaluated by an anonymous student survey. Results: Reliability estimates were high with narrow confidence intervals. CFA revealed acceptable goodness-of-fit indices for the proposed three-factor model. CDM analysis demonstrated good absolute test fit and high classification accuracy estimates. Student survey responses showed high levels of acceptability. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Practicum Script is a useful resource for strengthening students' clinical reasoning skills and ability to manage uncertainty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index