| Autor: |
Cohen, Nathaniel A., Choden, Tenzin, Dyer, Emma C., Garcia, Nicole M., Choi, Natalie K., Rubin, David T. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Digestive Diseases & Sciences; Aug2024, Vol. 69 Issue 8, p2955-2960, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: The Endoscopic Healing Index (EHI) analyzes biomarkers in a patient's peripheral blood to assess mucosal healing. We aimed to characterize the effectiveness of the EHI as a predictor of disease activity in a real world clinical setting. Methods: This retrospective study looked at patients treated and followed up at the University of Chicago Medicine IBD center who had EHI tests done as part of routine clinical care. The results of the EHI were compared with radiological imaging or endoscopy performed within 3 months of the EHI in order to determine accuracy at diagnosing active inflammation. Results: Fifty-five patients with CD and with an available EHI were included in this study. Four (50%) patients with an EHI of < 20 (n = 8) had evidence of objective inflammation. A cutoff of ≤ 20 had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 23.5% for predicting no evidence of any objective inflammation with an AUROC of 0.69. This score had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 50% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.3%. A cutoff EHI of 30 tended to classify patients as either having objective evidence of inflammation or not more often than FCAL (Correctly classifying inflammation: 89% vs 64%, respectively; p = 0.32). Conclusion: In this real world analysis, the EHI showed poor predictive value for the absence of active inflammation as assessed by imaging or endoscopy, has limited utility in confirming deep remission and should be used with another objective modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink