Analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection and other postoperative complications in patients following loop ileostomy reversal.

Autor: Borejsza-Wysocki, Maciej, Szmyt, Krzysztof, Jeske, Pamela, Bobkiewicz, Adam, Ledwosiński, Witold, Banasiewicz, Tomasz, Krokowicz, Łukasz
Předmět:
Zdroj: Polish Journal of Surgery; 2024, Vol. 96 Issue 4, p44-48, 5p
Abstrakt: Introduction: Loop ileostomy reversal (LIR) procedure is still associated with a relatively high risk of complications. Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication in this group of patients. SSI leads to prolonged hospital stays, delays the adjuvant therapy, and increases hospital costs. Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the risk factors for SSI in patients following loop ileostomy reversal procedure. Material and methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in a tertiary reference center. Finally, 65 patients following loop ileostomy reversal procedure performed between 2018 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. Data were collected retrospectively based on the available medical charts. The study group comprised 23 women (35%) and 42 men (65%) with a mean age of 48.9 ±14.5 years and a mean body mass index of 24.3 ±4.9 kg/m². The most common indication for index surgery was ulcerative colitis (33%) and colorectal cancer (29%). Preferably, handsewn anastomosis was performed (n = 42; 64.6%). Results: The most important parameter evaluated in the above study was the diagnosis of surgical site infection, which influenced e.g. hospitalization after surgery, the need for antibiotic therapy, or C-reactive protein (CRP) values. Nine patients (13.8%) were diagnosed with SSI during their hospital stay (more than 86% without SSI). In the group with SSI, hospital stay exceeded 13 days compared to almost 6 days in the group without SSI (P = 0.00009). The time of the procedure had a statistically significant correlation with antibiotic therapy introduction (P = 0.01). The type of intestinal anastomosis had a significant impact on the operative time (P = 0.0011) and the time of hospital stay after surgery (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Most of the analyzed clinical factors were directly related to the impact on the duration of postoperative hospitalization. The duration of hospitalization is an independent and undeniable factor increasing the risk of other postoperative complications and significantly increasing the cost of hospitalization. Another factor that has a large clinical impact on postoperative treatment is the presence of comorbidities which make patients more likely to develop SSI, CRP increase, or the need for antibiotic therapy. An important factor was the level of CRP, the elevated value of which may be a predictor of many negative aspects in postoperative treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index