| Autor: |
Veronese, Nicola, Briot, Karine, Guañabens, Nuria, Albergaria, Ben Hur, Alokail, Majed, Al-Daghri, Nasser, Bemden, Angie Botto-van, Bruyère, Olivier, Burlet, Nansa, Cooper, Cyrus, Curtis, Elizabeth M., Ebeling, Peter R., Halbout, Philippe, Hesse, Eric, Hiligsmann, Mickaël, Camargos, Bruno Muzzi, Harvey, Nicholas C., Perez, Adolfo Diez, Radermecker, Régis Pierre, Reginster, Jean-Yves |
| Zdroj: |
Aging Clinical & Experimental Research; 8/9/2024, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p1-12, 12p |
| Abstrakt: |
Bone forming agents, also known as anabolic therapies, are essential in managing osteoporosis, particularly for patients at very high-risk of fractures. Identifying candidates who will benefit the most from these treatments is crucial. For example, this group might include individuals with severe osteoporosis, multiple vertebral fractures, a recent fragility fracture or those unresponsive to antiresorptive treatments. Definitions of patients with a very high fracture risk vary across nations, are often based on fracture history, bone mineral density (BMD), and/or fracture risk calculated by FRAX® or other algorithms. However, for very high-risk patients, anabolic agents such as teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab are commonly recommended as first-line therapies due to their ability to stimulate new bone formation and improve bone microarchitecture, offering significant benefits in rapid fracture reduction over antiresorptive therapies. The cost-effectiveness of these agents is a critical consideration for decision-makers. Despite their higher costs, their effectiveness in significantly reducing fracture risk and improving quality of life can justify the investment, especially when long-term savings from reduced fracture rates and associated healthcare costs are considered. Additionally, after completing a course of anabolic therapy, transitioning to antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates or denosumab is crucial to maintain the gains in bone density and minimize subsequent fracture risks. This sequential treatment approach ensures sustained protection and optimal resource utilization. In summary, the effective use of bone forming agents in osteoporosis requires a comprehensive strategy that includes accurate patient identification, consideration of cost-effectiveness, and implementation of appropriate sequential treatments, ultimately maximizing patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink