| Abstrakt: |
The fracture resistance of adhesive joints depends on the bondline thickness, especially in the toughest systems. While increasing the adhesive thickness to operate at peak fracture toughness is anticipated to be attractive, it leads to a mass increase and to a decrease of the effective shear stiffness and strength, calling for a trade-off. Here, we follow a rational materials selection approach for mechanical design to address different sets of objectives and constraints representative of different classes of applications. The approach is applied to select the best conventional adhesive based on a novel database. Mechanical analysis with two different degrees of complexity is considered. The elementary level only accounts for the influence of thickness on toughness, while more advanced models introduce the dependence of shear strength on thickness as well as the stiffness mismatch with the adherends. The best adhesive choice strongly depends on the objectives, constraints, and loading configuration. However, the ranking is not drastically affected by the adherends' stiffness. Gaps found for stiff/strong and tough adhesives motivate the development of architected joints. Inserting stop holes improves damage tolerance and density but reduces the shear strength and stiffness, requiring an optimum design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
