Translating thyroid hormone into clinical practice: lessons learned from the post-hoc analysis on data available from the ThyRepair study.

Autor: Pantos, Constantinos I., Grigoriou, Konstantinos P., Trikas, Athanasios G., Alexopoulos, Nikolaos A., Mourouzis, Iordanis S.
Předmět:
Zdroj: Frontiers in Endocrinology; 2024, p1-7, 7p
Abstrakt: Background: Thyroid hormone (TH) appears to have a reparative action on the postinfarcted myocardium. This novel action was recently tested in a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ThyRepair). The present study performed a post-hoc analysis of data from the ThyRepair study to provide further insights into the novel actions of TH on the human postischemic myocardium. Methods: Data from 41 patients participating in the ThyRepair study (n = 20 placebo and n = 21 LT3) were included in the analysis. LT3 treatment started after stenting and continued intravenously for 48 h. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at hospital discharge; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF%), LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi;mL/m²), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi;mL/m²), infarct volume (IV), left ventricular mass index (LVMi) as edema index, and microvascular obstruction (MVO) were assessed. Patientswere divided into two groups based on the median value of the IV: patients with IV = 20% of the LV (group A) and patients with IV > 20% (group B). CMR measurements at discharge are expressed as mean ± SD. Results: In group A, the placebo and T3-treated groups had similar LVEF% (56.8 ± 10.2 vs. 52.2 ± 10.5), LVEDVi (90.9 ± 19.8 vs. 92.8 ± 14.5), and LVESVi (40.8 ± 18.2 vs. 44.9 ± 14.1) at discharge. In group B, LVEDVi and LVESVi were 112 ± 23.8 and 68.3 ± 21.5 for placebo vs. 91.8 ± 18.6 and 49.0 ± 14.0 for the T3-treated group, respectively, p < 0.05. LVEF% was significantly increased in the T3-treated group vs. placebo, 47.3 ± 6.5 vs. 39.9 ± 8.7, p < 0.05. In group B, CMR LVMi was lower in T3-treated patients vs. placebo but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). MVO was 1.95 ± 2.2 in placebo vs. 0.84 ± 0.9 in the LT3-treated group, p = 0.15. Conclusion: The present study suggests that acute LT3 treatment may exert more favorable effects on the recovery of cardiac function in patients with large infarct size. Furthermore, it signals a potential effect of LT3 on myocardial edema andmicrovascular obstruction. These novel findings merit further investigation in large trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index