| Abstrakt: |
Electrically evoked contractions are used to assess the relationship between frequency input and contractile output to characterize inherent muscle function, and these have been done mostly with isometric contractions (i.e., no joint rotation). The purpose was to compare the electrically stimulated frequency and contractile function relationship during isometric (i.e., torque) with isotonic (i.e., concentric torque, angular velocity, and mechanical power) contractions. The knee extensors of 16 (5 female) young recreationally active participants were stimulated (∼1–2.5 s) at 14 frequencies from 1 to 100 Hz. This was done during four conditions, which were isometric and isotonic at loads of 0 (unloaded), 7.5%, and 15% isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and repeated on separate days. Comparisons across contractile parameters were made as a % of 100 Hz. Independent of the load, the mechanical power-frequency relationship was rightward shifted compared with isometric torque-frequency, concentric torque-frequency, and velocity-frequency relationships (all P ≤ 0.04). With increasing load (0%–15% MVC), the isotonic concentric torque-frequency relationship was shifted leftward systematically from 15 to 30 Hz (all P ≤ 0.04). Conversely, the same changes in load caused a rightward shift in the velocity-frequency relationship from 1 to 40 Hz (all P ≤ 0.03). Velocity was leftward shifted of concentric torque in the unloaded isotonic condition from 10 to 25 Hz (all P ≤ 0.03), but concentric torque was leftward shifted of velocity at 15% MVC isotonic condition from 10 to 50 Hz (all P ≤ 0.03). Therefore, isometric torque is not a surrogate to evaluate dynamic contractile function. Interpretations of evoked contractile function differ depending on contraction type, load, and frequency, which should be considered relative to the specific task. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: In whole human muscle, we showed that the electrically stimulated power-frequency relationship was rightward shifted of the stimulated isometric torque-frequency relationship independent of isotonic load, indicating that higher stimulation frequencies are needed to achieve tetanus. Therefore, interpretations of evoked contractile function differ depending on contraction type (isometric vs. dynamic), load, and frequency. And thus, isometric measures may not be appropriate as a surrogate assessment when evaluating dynamic isotonic contractile function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
