| Abstrakt: |
For children in the United States, family instability following parental relationship dissolution is common and efforts to promote effective post‐divorce co‐parenting arrangements have grown substantially in recent decades. To help families navigate transitions through the divorce process, most states require divorcing parents to complete divorce education programming. In the present study we used pre‐post data from three divorce education programs (n = 1026 parents) to explore programmatic effects on self‐reported adjustment, intentions to co‐parent, and likelihood to relitigate, and attempt to determine mechanisms that may account for or explain those programmatic effects. Overall, we found support that these programs are able to impact perceived adjustment and co‐parenting intentions. Specifically, we documented small, but significant, increases in perceived adjustment and that post‐program adjustment was associated with greater intentions to engage in supportive co‐parenting with former spouses. Further, co‐parenting intentions were shaped by how useful parents found the programs with greater perceived utility being associated with more positive co‐parenting intentions. The relitigation outcomes, however, were not associated with post‐program adjustment or perceived program utility. Instead, they were primarily associated with pre‐program experiences such as the quality of co‐parenting prior to the program and whether an order of protection was present between co‐parents. Key Points for the Family Court Community: Though divorce education programs have numerous and varying goals, most programs share similar targeted metrics around intentions to cooperatively co‐parent and decrease the need for parents to relitigate, underlining why these metrics should be assessed in evaluation work.Perceived utility of a divorce education program can be instructive in understanding how well parents are supported by these programs. Parents with lower perceived adjustment before entering the program typically perceive programs have greater utility.Participants that perceive utility in the divorce education program they take are more likely to intend to co‐parent cooperatively, than those that do not find utility in their program.Intentions to relitigate do not seem tied to perceptions of adjustment or utility of the programs, but rather on pre‐existing contextual factors like the presence of intimate partner violence and the existing nature of the co‐parenting relationship. This finding lends to the body of literature suggesting the potential benefit for tailored programming and screening prior to placement in divorce education programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Plný text