| Abstrakt: |
This study evaluates and ranks wireless communication technologies for agricultural irrigation systems using the CRITIC-CODAS multi-criteria decisionmaking method. WSN, LPWAN, LoRa, 5G, IoT, and NB-IoT are compared based on range, power consumption, data rate, coverage, latency, battery life, and device density. The CRITIC method objectively determines criteria weights, with data rate, latency, and battery life emerging as the most critical factors. 5G ranks highest with its superior data rate and device density, but its high-power needs may limit suitability for remote agriculture. IoT offers a balanced option across multiple criteria, while WSN excels in power efficiency and battery life. Despite lower data rates, LPWAN, LoRa, and NB-IoT provide excellent range and battery life for wide-area, low-power applications. The analysis offers a framework for stakeholders to select appropriate technologies based on specific agricultural requirements. Matching wireless technologies to irrigation needs can enhance agricultural sustainability and productivity. Further research could explore technology combinations, cost factors, and real-world testing. This systematic evaluation approach can be extended to other intelligent agriculture applications to optimize technology adoption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
