Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Out-ofHospital Cardiac Arrest Outcome in Vietnam.
| Autor: | Dao, Co Xuan, Luong, Chinh Quoc, Toshie Manabe, Nguyen, My Ha, Pham, Dung Thi, Ton, Tra Thanh, Ai Hoang, Quoc Trong, Nguyen, Tuan Anh, Nguyen, Anh Dat, McNall, Bryan Francis, Hock, Marcus Eng, Do, Son Ngoc |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
SCIENTIFIC observation
MULTIPLE regression analysis EMERGENCY medicine EMERGENCY medical services TREATMENT effectiveness RETROSPECTIVE studies MULTIVARIATE analysis DESCRIPTIVE statistics BYSTANDER CPR ODDS ratio RESEARCH MEDICAL records ACQUISITION of data CARDIAC arrest SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry) |
| Zdroj: | Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health; Jul2024, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p507-520, 14p |
| Abstrakt: | Introduction: Patients experiencing an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) frequently do not receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In this study we sought to determine the prevalence of OHCA patients in Vietnam who received bystander CPR and its effects on survival outcomes. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective observational study of patients (≥18 years) presenting with OHCA at three major hospitals in an LMIC from February 2014-December 2018. We collected data on the hospital and patient characteristics, the cardiac arrest events, the emergency medical services (EMS) system, the therapy methods, and the outcomes and compared these data, before and after pairwise 1:1 propensity score matching, between patients who received bystander CPR and those who did not. Upon admission, we assessed factors associated with good neurological survival at hospital discharge in univariable and multivariable logistic models. Results: Of 521 patients, 388 (74.5%) were men, and the mean age was 56.7 years (SD 17.3). Although most cardiac arrests (68.7%, 358/521) occurred at home and 78.8% (410/520) were witnessed, a low proportion (22.1%, 115/521) of these patients received bystander CPR. Only half of the patients were brought by EMS (8.1%, 42/521) or private ambulance (42.8%, 223/521), 50.8% (133/262) of whom had resuscitation attempts. Before matching, there was a significant difference in good neurological survival between patients who received bystander CPR (12.2%, 14/115) and patients who did not (4.7%, 19/406; P < .001). After matching, good neurological survival was absent in all OHCA patients who did not receive CPR from a bystander. The multivariable analysis showed that bystander CPR (adjusted odds ratio: 3.624; 95% confidence interval 1.629-8.063) was an independent predictor of good neurological survival. Conclusion: In our study, only 22.1% of total OHCA patients received bystander CPR, which contributed significantly to a low rate of good neurological survival in Vietnam. To improve the chances of survival with good neurological functions of OHCA patients, more people should be trained to perform bystander CPR and teach others as well. A standard program for emergency first-aid training is necessary for this purpose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|